Sunday, September 2, 2007

The Craig Case: Over-Reaction?

In a hard-hitting editorial, Mark R. Levin takes on the question of whether or not there's not only a kneejerk over-reaction to the Craig case, but whether modern liberalism has led to "culture of corruption" boogeymen.



so, Larry Craig is gone. He solicited sex without actually soliciting sex or having sex. He pled guilty, but not to lewd behavior — to disorderly conduct (a misdemeanor). He is said to have a secret life involving same sex partners, but where are all these partners? According to one report, a guy in college believes Craig hit on him in 1967. Another says he “believes” he performed oral sex on the senator in a restroom at Union Station. He’s not 100-percent sure. If Craig has been living this secret life since 1967, you’d think others would come forward at some point. Maybe they will. So far, they haven’t. Indeed, where is all the evidence of Craig’s seedy life? Where are the photos, the video, the audio, the solid witnesses, and the rest of the evidence? And if the case against Craig in that airport restroom was so compelling, if it was so sleazy, if authorities wanted to send a message to others, why didn’t prosecutors take Craig to trial? Why let him go with a disorderly conduct misdemeanor? Were they doing him a favor? I don’t think so. They conducted a sting operation without any sting.



Tags: | | | | | | | |

No comments:

Post a Comment

Hi, thanks for visiting. Now it's your turn. I'm listening to what you have to say!