Special Report: Congress vs. Pentagon in Protecting US Troops

The Democratic-led Congress says the Pentagon isn't doing enough to send armored trucks and other protective gear to troops in Iraq. The Pentagon says it is.

Meanwhile, troops continue to die as IEDs explode across the landscape. At home, a Democratic-led Congress juggles two balls: stop the war, send more to the war.

This USA Today report looks at the processes and people that bog down in getting materiels to the front lines.

The June 19 letter from the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee began with a message that top Pentagon officials had heard before: "I remain concerned about the Army's slow reaction …" wrote Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich.

The subject was sending better armor to Iraq — specifically, a vehicle called the Bull, a heavily armored truck designed to guard against the latest and deadliest incarnation of the improvised explosive devices used in attacks on U.S. forces. IEDs have claimed the lives of more than half the U.S. troops killed in combat in Iraq.

The concern Levin voiced to Defense Secretary Robert Gates was fundamental: After four years of war, he feared that the Pentagon still wasn't doing enough to protect U.S. troops — and wouldn't, unless prodded by Congress.

The fears appear to be well-founded, a USA TODAY investigation shows. Since the war began, members of Congress — Democrats and Republicans — repeatedly have forced the Defense Department to invest in body armor, order devices to jam signals from detonators used by insurgent bombers, and buy vehicles that top military officials initially deemed unnecessary.

Source: usatoday.com

NowPublic

Tags: armaments | Congress. troops | humvees | Iraq | Pentagon | protection | supplies